Alberta General Insurance Level 1 Practice Exam

Question: 1 / 400

In which situation would comprehensive auto insurance be most appropriate?

For protection against theft or vandalism of a vehicle

Comprehensive auto insurance is designed to provide coverage for a variety of risks that are not directly related to collisions with other vehicles. This type of insurance is most appropriate for protecting against risks such as theft, vandalism, fire, natural disasters, and other incidents that can cause damage to a vehicle but do not involve a collision with another car.

In the context of the question, the choice regarding protection against theft or vandalism directly aligns with the primary purpose of comprehensive coverage. This protection is crucial for vehicle owners who want to safeguard their investment from loss or damage that occurs outside of their control, such as someone stealing the vehicle or intentionally damaging it.

Conversely, the other choices outline different types of coverage that are not encompassed by comprehensive insurance. For instance, coverage for collision events specifically focuses on damage resulting from accidents involving another vehicle or object, and legal liability pertains to injuries or damages sustained by others in an accident involving the insured vehicle. The option mentioning driver-related accidents suggests a focus solely on incidents attributable to the driver's actions, which falls under different types of coverage, such as liability or collision insurance, rather than comprehensive.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

To cover damages from collision events

For legal liability arising from accidents

To insure against driver-related accidents only

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy